Every GDPR obligation checked against evidence.
Lawful basis, records, transparency, data subject rights, transfers, security, breach response, accountability. Each article gets a finding, a severity rating and a remediation owner.
Article-by-article assessment by senior privacy specialists. Records of processing, DPIA inventory, transfer mechanism, data subject rights workflow, vendor contracts and incident plan. Audit report and remediation tracker in four weeks.
One business day reply. Clear next steps and indicative pricing.
Lawful basis, records, transparency, data subject rights, transfers, security, breach response, accountability. Each article gets a finding, a severity rating and a remediation owner.
We read the actual records, sample DSR responses, review DPIAs, interview process owners and test the workflow end to end. The report cites the evidence inline.
The audit report and action plan are structured so that the supervisory authority can read them directly. Where the regulator already opened a file, the audit feeds into the response.
Four-week audit covering every GDPR article. Report, finding register, remediation plan and board paper.
Targeted audit when a supervisory authority has opened a file or scheduled an on-site visit.
Single-area deep dive: ROPA, DPIA, transfers, DSR workflow, breach plan or controller-processor mapping.
Four weeks. Week one is scoping and document collection. Weeks two and three are evidence review and interviews. Week four is reporting, board paper and the remediation tracker. Findings cite the evidence inline so the report stands up to follow-up review.
Article 30 records and Article 44 transfers remain the most cited issues in supervisory decisions and audit reports across the EU.
Inspections move past questionnaires into evidence sampling. The audit report has to align with what an examiner finds on site.
Authorities check that the data protection programme is sponsored at board level. Audit reports increasingly reference governance evidence.
We read the documents, sample the operational workflow, interview process owners and test the controls. The report cites the specific evidence behind each finding so it stands up to a supervisory review. A checklist gives you a score; an audit gives you a defensible file.
Yes. The focused-audit model covers one of: Article 30 records, DPIA programme, transfer mechanism, DSR workflow, breach plan, vendor and processor mapping. Fixed fee, 2 to 3 weeks per area.
When a supervisory file is open or an on-site is scheduled, we mobilise within 5 business days. Day one to day five is scoping, document collection and interview plan. Weeks two and three deliver the evidence pack and the response draft.
A senior privacy lead with CIPP/E certification runs the audit. Larger programmes include a second reviewer for ROPA and DPIA samples. The board paper is signed off by the audit lead.
Yes if you want it. We deliver the finding register and remediation owner map with the report. From there, we can either hand off to your internal team or continue as a remediation retainer for a defined period.
Fixed fee on a defined scope. The scoping call lets us write the scope letter, which fixes the price. There are no time-and-materials charges inside the scope.
Scope letter template for a full GDPR audit, including evidence list, interview plan and deliverable definition.
Document and evidence checklist used when a supervisory authority opens a file or schedules an on-site visit.
Field-by-field review questions and sample evidence for a controller and processor record of processing.
External DPO service and ongoing GDPR programme support for organisations under Article 37 obligation.
Open practice →Article 27 representative for non-EU controllers and processors offering goods or services to people in the EU.
Open practice →Third-party due diligence, contracts and ongoing monitoring across critical service providers.
Open practice →Send the brief. We respond with a scoped agenda for the first call.